For a long time, like most agencies, we treated photography and video as something to brief out. A production house would get a creative brief, disappear for a few weeks, and come back with assets that were technically excellent and, more often than we'd like to admit, slightly off-brand. Eventually we stopped outsourcing it. Here's what changed.
The obvious cost of outsourced production is the fee. The less obvious cost is everything around it: the brief that has to explain brand context a production house doesn't already have, the turnaround time waiting for a crew's availability, and the revision cycles when the result looks great but doesn't quite sound like the brand it's for.
Content volume expectations have grown substantially — across social, campaigns, and website content — while budgets for any single piece of content have generally not grown at the same rate. Producing more, faster, without a proportional increase in cost, is only realistically possible when production sits close to the team planning the content, not separated from it by a briefing document.
This isn't an argument that outsourced production is always the wrong call — for large, occasional hero campaigns, a specialist external crew can still make sense. The point is narrower: for the ongoing, regular content most businesses actually need, in-house production removes friction that outsourcing structurally can't.
Our Photography & Video Production service is delivered entirely in-house, connected directly to the same team handling content strategy and campaign delivery — not a separate briefing exercise handed to someone outside the room.