Website accessibility is often treated as a nice-to-have — something to address if there's budget left over. In Australia, it isn't optional in the way that framing suggests. Understanding the actual legal position, rather than the general sense that "accessibility matters," changes how seriously it gets prioritised.
The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA) makes it unlawful to discriminate against someone on the basis of disability in the provision of goods, services and facilities — and this has been found by Australian courts to extend to websites. The most well-known case establishing this was brought against the Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games in 2000, over inaccessible Olympics ticketing and information content.
There is no single, universally mandated technical standard written directly into the DDA itself, but the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), currently at version 2.1, are the recognised international benchmark, and are formally required for Australian government websites at Level AA. Courts and complaints processes generally treat WCAG conformance as the practical measure of whether a site meets its obligations.
Beyond the ethical and commercial case — a more accessible site is a more usable site for everyone — formal complaints under the DDA can and have resulted in enforceable outcomes for Australian organisations. It's a genuine legal exposure, not just a best-practice suggestion.
Sufficient colour contrast, proper heading structure, descriptive alt text on images, keyboard-navigable interfaces, and captioned video are the practical foundations most sites are missing at least some of. None of these are difficult individually — the difficulty is usually that they were never planned for from the start.
Accessibility is built into how we approach every project — read more on our Website Security & Accessibility page, or see how it's considered from the first design decision under Website Design & Development.